
You’re stopped at the light on Delaware and Chippewa, waiting for it to turn, when a car runs the red from your left, and there’s no time to do anything but brace. The other driver is already out of their car, saying they thought the light was still yellow, and you’re not sure if that matters or if the dash cam from the car behind you even caught it.
A police report gets started right there on the corner, but nobody tells you what happens to it after that, or how a busy Buffalo intersection factors into who’s at fault. New York Auto Law understands how confusing it feels to be told to wait for the report and see what happens, and we step in to help you understand who’s responsible and what your next move should be.
What Should I Do After an Intersection Accident in Buffalo?
Get medical care first, and if you are able, take photos of both vehicles’ final positions and any visible skid marks before traffic clears the scene. Then contact a Buffalo intersection accident lawyer before giving a detailed statement to any insurance company, since disputed intersection cases are often decided by evidence gathered in the first days, not weeks later. New York Auto Law can begin that investigation immediately.
What Are the Most Common Types of Intersection Accidents?
Not every intersection crash raises the same legal questions. Here is a look at the most common scenarios we see across Buffalo and Western New York.
Left-Turn Accidents
A driver turning left across oncoming traffic is often presumed to be at fault, since New York law generally requires a left-turning driver to yield right of way to vehicles already close enough to be a hazard. But that is not automatic liability. If the oncoming driver was speeding, ran a stale yellow light, or was otherwise driving unsafely, fault can shift substantially, which is why these cases often depend on exact timing and speed rather than the direction of the turn itself.
Red-Light Accidents
Red-light crashes often come down to a direct conflict: both drivers insist they had the green. Traffic camera footage, when it exists, can resolve this conflict quickly. Still, many Buffalo intersections lack cameras, so the timing of traffic signals, witness accounts, and the physical dynamics of the crash itself often become the deciding evidence instead.
Failure-to-Yield Accidents
New York law treats a collision after failing to stop or yield at a yield sign as evidence, in itself, of the failure to yield, meaning the crash can partly speak for itself in these specific cases rather than requiring outside proof from scratch.
How Are Commercial Truck Turns Different at an Intersection?
A commercial truck cannot turn the way a passenger car does. Because of the trailer’s length, a truck making a right turn often needs to swing left first, sometimes crossing into an adjacent lane or even into oncoming traffic, to give the trailer enough room to clear the corner without hitting a curb or another vehicle.
A driver unfamiliar with this maneuver may assume the truck is turning left, or may try to pass on the right while the truck is mid-turn, not realizing the trailer is about to swing back into that space. When a crash happens this way, the investigation often depends on whether the truck driver signaled and positioned the truck properly in advance, and whether the other driver had a genuine opportunity to recognize what the truck was doing.
Who Has the Right of Way at a Buffalo Intersection?
New York’s right-of-way laws depend heavily on the specific intersection. At an uncontrolled intersection, a driver who has already entered generally has the right of way over one still approaching.
A driver turning left must yield to oncoming traffic that is already in the intersection or close enough to pose an immediate hazard. At a stop sign, a driver must come to a full stop and then yield to any vehicle already in the intersection or approaching so closely as to be a hazard; at a yield sign, a driver must slow or stop as needed and yield in the same way.
When Does a Reconstructionist Help a Left Turn Accident Lawyer in Buffalo?
When two drivers each insist the crash was the other person’s fault, it can feel like your case comes down to nothing more than which version an insurance adjuster decides to believe. It usually is not that simple.
Adrenaline and shock are well documented to distort how people remember fast-moving, frightening events, which means an honest driver’s memory of a two-second crash is not always reliable, even when that driver is genuinely trying to tell the truth. Physical evidence does not have that problem because it can show the:
- Location and pattern of vehicle damage,
- Direction and length of any skid marks, and
- Final resting position of both vehicles after impact.
These pieces of evidence often tell a consistent, reconstructable story, regardless of what either driver remembers or believes happened. An accident reconstructionist is a professional trained to read that story. By examining the physical evidence at the scene and analyzing the vehicles involved, a reconstructionist can often determine the sequence of events, including speed, point of impact, and direction of travel, independent of either driver’s account.
What If a Pedestrian or Cyclist Were Hurt in the Crash?
A driver making a disputed left turn or running a red light can just as easily strike a pedestrian or cyclist crossing legally at the same time, and these cases raise their own fault questions separate from a typical two-car dispute. A driver in this situation often claims they never saw the pedestrian or cyclist, or that the person crossed unexpectedly.
New York law places a real burden on drivers to watch for exactly this. The same evidence that resolves a two-car dispute is often just as useful in establishing what actually happened when the person hurt was on foot or on a bike rather than behind the wheel of the other vehicle.
What Does an Intersection Crash Attorney in Buffalo, NY, Do to Help Prove Fault?
Building a strong intersection case takes proactive, early work. New York Auto Law typically:
- Requests any available traffic camera footage from the intersection, from a nearby business, or from a red-light camera program, where one exists;
- Canvasses the area for witnesses who may have seen the crash, since bystanders often leave the scene before police arrive;
- Obtains the official police report and any citations issued at the scene;
- Photographs and documents vehicle damage in detail, since damage patterns can reveal the direction and force of impact; and
- Engages an accident reconstructionist when the facts are genuinely disputed and warrant that level of analysis.
This kind of early, hands-on investigation often determines whether an intersection case comes down to real evidence or just two competing stories.
Does New York’s No-Fault Insurance Cover an Intersection Accident?
Yes, in most cases. New York requires no-fault insurance to cover basic medical expenses and a portion of lost wages regardless of who caused the crash. No-fault benefits have limits, though, and are not designed to cover every cost of a serious injury.
If your injuries meet New York’s legal definition of a serious injury, which includes specific categories such as a fracture, significant disfigurement, or a permanent or significant limitation of a body function, you may be able to pursue a claim against the at-fault driver directly for costs no-fault does not cover, including pain and suffering.
New York follows a comparative-fault rule for motor vehicle injury claims. Recovery is barred only if your own fault is found to be greater than the fault of the driver you are suing.
Here is what that looks like in practice. Say you were speeding as you approached the intersection, and the other driver ran the light, turning left. A jury may decide that the speeding made you 15% at fault for the accident. If you had received $100,000, you could still recover $85,000. However, if you were found 51% at fault, you would not recover anything at all. Small differences in how fault gets divided can make a tremendous difference.
New York Auto Law Wants to Represent You As Your Buffalo Intersection Accident Lawyer
New York Auto Law’s attorneys bring decades of combined experience representing people injured in motor vehicle crashes across New York. Our focus is on car, truck, and motorcycle cases only. You work directly with the attorneys handling your case, which means the investigative work, the work to get ready for a trial, the negotiations with the other driver’s insurance agency, and going to trial if need be, is completed by the same people you first speak with.
Get a Real Answer, Not a Runaround
You do not have to prove your case by out-arguing another driver’s insurance company. New York Auto Law can investigate what happened at the intersection and build your case on the evidence. Reach out today for a free consultation, and let an experienced team get to work on your behalf.
Legal References Used to Inform This Page
To ensure the accuracy and clarity of this page, we referenced official legal and other resources during the content development process:
- Vehicle turning left, N.Y. Veh. & Traf. Law § 1141 (2014).
- Vehicle entering stop or yield intersection, N.Y. Veh. & Traf. Law § 1142 (2014).
- Vehicle approaching or entering intersection, N.Y. Veh. & Traf. Law § 1140 (2014).
- Definitions, N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102(d) and (j) (2026).
- Damages recoverable when contributory negligence or assumption of risk is established, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(b) (2026).

